September 03, 2010

Mobile-building interaction in Linz

Alexander Wiethoff of the Department for Informatics at LMU Munich (and a former Experientia intern - disclosure) has developed with the Univeristy of Saarbrücken a mobile device application that enables a radically new form of interaction with buildings that will be shown Sunday and Monday at Ars Electronica in Linz, Austria.

"By combining a recently developed mobile software application with the multimedia facade of the ARS Electronica building [...] we developed two prototypes: in the first application, users can paint interactively on the building using touch input on the mobile device. In a second application, users are able to solve a jigsaw puzzle displayed on the facade."

via LIFT and Alexander Wiethoff

(more...)


September 02, 2010

Open for Branding Week 6: We Heard You!

dmb_core77_process-1.jpg
openforbranding.jpg

Continuum continues their series Open for Branding, where they are sharing, from start to finish, their latest branding project for the new, nomadic Design Museum Boston.

Wow. Last week, we posted our Design Museum Boston branding concepts for feedback, and more than 1700 people checked out our survey and 274 completed it. The greatest part: everyone aligned--Continuum, Design Museum Boston, and you—on which directions were the strongest.

dmb_chart.jpg
(more...)


The Biennale in Venice - The 12th International Architecture Exhibition.

Cloud, by Matthias Schuler and Tetsuo Kondo When coming to Venice, the first impression of the 2010 Architecture Biennale is pretty straightforward: “People meet in Architecture” is written...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit www.an-architecture.com for content. ]]

Theater of Immersion

[Image: Photo by Jim Stephenson].

Architectural photographer Jim Stephenson got in touch the other week with some photos he recently took of an elaborate stage set, constructed by the group dreamthinkspeak, for a new play based on Anton Chekhov's "The Cherry Orchard."

The play was performed in Brighton, England, inside an old department store, the entirety of which had been transformed into a labyrinthine performance space, complete with a Russian supermarket, a simulated department store (within the very frame of the abandoned one), and a cottage surrounded by artificial snow.

[Images: Photos by Jim Stephenson].

There are nurseries and ballrooms, writing desks and dioramas, all stashed away inside a massive performance space through which the audience must walk, as if chasing down scenes.

[Images: Photos by Jim Stephenson].

I'll let Stephenson himself describe the building:
    The venue was the old Co-Op building on London Road, Brighton, familiar to most people who live in the city. Opened in 1931, the Co-Op was the largest department store in the city when it closed 3 years ago. It has been neglected since... A large department store, wandering around it was incredible to see how quickly it had fallen into such a bad state. It reminded me of the first few chapters of The World Without Us, where Weisman talks about the processes that would take place around, inside and on our buildings should humans disappear. Indeed, it could be a study of such processes—damp creeps in everywhere, stripping render from the basement walls and warping and tearing the plywood paneling upstairs. Plant life eases through gaps and cracks. Carpet has lifted and the building has a terrific smell of decay. Yet in the stockrooms, still evident, is graffiti from the early 70’s—name checking footballers that have long since retired, bought pubs and passed on. Locally, there has been calls, growing stronger and stronger, for the owners or the council to inhabit the building. This is where dreamthinkspeak stepped in to temporarily transform the former department store into an incredible series of set-pieces, opening up such a familiar building to a public for the first time in three years, curious to see what had happened the their local shop.
The ensuing world of the play included some interesting moments of self-reference; as Stephenson writes: "The basement of the Co-Op used to feature some beautiful leaded windows around the circulation areas and these have been re-used with elaborate models of show apartments and odd and surreal rooms placed behind the glass. Closer inspection shows that these surreal rooms are models of the rooms we’ve already passed through and (we’ll soon learn) rooms to come."

[Image: The "leaded windows... re-used with elaborate models of show apartments and odd and surreal rooms," photographed by Jim Stephenson].

Indeed, one of the most architecturally interesting details of the production was its use of small models that refer to, repeat, or reveal in advance spaces of the play itself. Or, as Stephenson writes, "Repetition of themes continues throughout the show, using increasingly imaginative set-pieces to remind us of where we’ve been." It's as if the play somehow stutters, blurting out smaller versions of itself—like an inhabitable 3D printer that can't help but create images of its own surroundings.

In one of the images below, for instance, Stephenson writes that we see a table "covered in a forest of formerly lit candles"—and within the melted wax, "models of the couple from earlier [in the play] sit drinking tea." It's microcosmic self-repetition—a kind of ontological splintering in architectural form.

This takes on a somewhat mind-bending dimension when we learn that, in the fake department store (within the ruined department store...), attendees are confronted with architectural models "lent to the show by the architects Conran & Partners (so, interestingly, these models are for actual redevelopments that may someday be built)." That is, real buildings, constructed perhaps ten or more years from now, could someday be realistically interpreted as hypertrophied spatial aftereffects of this particular stage set.

[Images: Photos by Jim Stephenson].

In any case, I've included many of Stephenson's photos here, documenting the experience, but there are more on his website (along with a much longer description of the space).

[Image: Photo by Jim Stephenson].

You'll find that I've barely even begun to describe the set's intricacy: there are internal CCTV networks covering the unfolding of the play, multi-lingual actors and actresses wandering through the scenes, and even a secret passageway through a department store cupboard. The final space, like the boss level of some massive new game, "is a huge room, almost an entire floor of the Co-Op," Stephenson explains, "filled with the remains of a former orchard. A deforestation scene, with woodchips all over the floor and tree stumps left."

[Image: Photo by Jim Stephenson].

And, with that, this particular variation on Chekhov's "Cherry Orchard" comes to an end.

(Also check out Jim Stephenson's straight-ahead architectural photography while you are at his site).

Tony Judt: R.I.P.

Tony Judt: An Intellectual Journey

I have my own tiny anecdote about Tony Judt.

His article "Europe vs. America" (NYRB Feb 10, 2005) opened with a critique of Starbucks' coffee and that the company had "encountered unexpected foreign resistance."

As a fan of Starbucks and with a great interest in "third places" I questioned Judt's assessment of Starbucks— in the USA I think it has been of significant cultural value and he totally misunderstood it. I further questioned the factual basis for his assertion (that Starbucks was not doing so well with European consumers.) In fact there were no facts. His riff on Starbucks was total assertion and without even an attempt to be reality-based. I am not exactly sure what I asked him; it might have been as bald as "Where are your facts?" 

He responded and I recollect it was a courteous email. But he mentioned something which, contrary to supporting his argument, actually undercut it.

I then wrote back and asked him whether I could quote him (on my blog.) I am pretty certain that I had told him in my first email that I had already quoted him:  The centrality of coffee?

Judt refused briskly. Of course as a matter of courtesy I accepted, though with some misgivings as I had made clear that I was micro-media (so had given him fair warning) and more importantly, his response was so juicy.

Alas, I wish I could remember exactly what he said as I no longer have the correspondence.

 

Seemingly oblivious to the city around her, the young woman takes the mobile phone from her ear and presses a button. Suddenly, floating in the ether directly in front of her a message appears: “New Dress code: FUNKY.” With a smirk and a wave of her hand, she’s suddenly surrounded by three new translucent windows, enveloping her in the heads-up-display of the Fifth Avenue fighter pilot. A growing smile is evidence that some urban attack pattern has been implemented and with a final wave of the hand, the virtual displays fall away – replaced with the advertising message: “Life moves fast. Don’t miss a thing.”

To tear down the Viaduct — and then not tear down the Viaduct

Four powerhouse teams named finalists in central waterfront design elicits one fabulously humorous comment:
I think it would be really incredible if the design included demolishing the top level, but keeping the lower level of the viaduct (which is not by itself seismically threatened), using it as a promenade for walkers,etc. with several connections to 1st ave. This allows a view over the top of the water front buildings
My comment:
Ruffner (the commenter) et al.
Can you spell "Irony?" "Humor?" "Peels of laughter?"

I take no other position on any design as it will not happen, so why bother. And your idea about keeping part of the Viaduct may well make design sense.

But don't you folks see how absurd, stupid, asinine it would be to spend mucho $$$ billions to tear down the Viaduct — and then not tear down the Viaduct?

Give me a break, folks -- no matter what your view, don't you see the absurdity? Laugh.

International Panel on Climate Change

"The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is the leading body for the assessment of climate change, established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to provide the world with a clear scientific view on the current state of climate change and its potential environmental and socio-economic consequences.

The IPCC is a scientific body. It reviews and assesses the most recent scientific, technical and socio-economic information produced worldwide relevant to the understanding of climate change. It does not conduct any research nor does it monitor climate related data or parameters. Thousands of scientists from all over the world contribute to the work of the IPCC on a voluntary basis. Review is an essential part of the IPCC process, to ensure an objective and complete assessment of current information. Differing viewpoints existing within the scientific community are reflected in the IPCC reports." to find out more...

September 01, 2010

Plus ca change....? The world starts when we remember.

Several days I commented on the statement "Ten years ago, when the urbanist movement was in its infancy and supporters were few and far between..." and in return was challenged by BeyondDC in a comment.

Now it's not an essential question but an interesting one: if, how and to what degree has the "urbanist movement" changed, grown (in numbers or quality of thought) since 2000 and from a low level to much higher? 

Obviously, what are the metrics? On his own terms "few and far between" is about numbers though let's broaden it to the breadth of thinking, too.

It will depend on judgment and the priorities. For me, "walkable urbanism" is the sine qua non and sums up the question.  And certainly there has been some progress. The state of the built environment shows some progress and there have been some excellent (both large and small) urbanism. (The massive development in downtown Evanston, IL 

Some of the intellectual threads: There is no question that certain elements have grown to very little or to even nothing and there is a tangle of intertwined initiatives: urban agriculture (locavorism,) congestion pricing, peak oil, demand-responsive on-street parking payment, dismissal of starchitecture, green roofs have become a focus of discussion…but help me out...what else has happened in the past ten years?

So yes those (and perhaps more) are interesting and perhaps even significant.

Now if it's a matter of raw numbers, then maybe so. There are more people who are aware. But so far as I see. the key major threads in urbanism long pre-date 2000: environmentalism in general, sustainability, energy issues, Jane Jacobs and new urbanism in particular and very specifically the knowledge of how to build walkable urbanism. None are new and all are logical outgrowths (correct or not) from urban thinking of the past 40 years; and none, sadly, are especially well-practiced. (I cite Seattle Sheraton Hotel's pathetic 7th Avenue urbanism as an example of our having learned little.) There are some breakthrough into experimentation: application of traffic-calming in mid-town Manhattan is big and to be applauded. The ideas of traffic-calming were not new (though not very old, also -- maybe the early 1990s) but I assume that political support (in NYC) has grown. So some change, yes. But a lot? Look at how we squandered our wealth in the past ten years through our enormous suburbanization. I don't see that whatever "urbanist movement" we have is much beyond its infancy. Too much moralizing. (e.g. James Howard Kunstler.) Too many gimmicks. ("Green everything.") Not enough sheer fun in citiness. Alas.
 

What do you think?

Maybe it's mostly about when we, as individuals, become conscious; and I became conscious well-before 2000. 

But there are historic discontinuities, eras when things changes, when people start to think differently. The long decade from 1960 to 1975 might well be one. I don't see 2000 being such a marker.

Windy City

[Image: "Storm Clouds Over Central Park" by Joseph Bergantine].

Do urban landscapes act as attractors for storms and hurricanes? "New research shows that rough areas of land, including city buildings and naturally jagged land cover like trees and forests, can actually attract passing hurricanes," a study claimed last week.

It works because the whole landscape acts as a kind of vortex or chimney: "Rough cityscapes and forests trap air. This compresses the air and forces it up into the atmosphere, adding energy to the storm and pulling the center of the hurricane toward the rough region. As a result, a city can cause a hurricane to swerve from its predicted path by as much as 20 miles."
    "Cities impose greater friction on the swirling flow because of the tall buildings," said Johnny Chan, a professor of meteorology at the [City University of Hong Kong]. "Our results show that tropical cyclones tend to be 'attracted' towards areas of higher friction. So it is possible that cities could cause tropical cyclones to veer towards them."
Defining cities simply as "rough areas of land," comparable to forests or cliffsides, seems actually to underestimate the bewildering porosity, and thus the true storm potential, of urban space—with tens of thousands of rooms and corridors, offering slightly different levels of temperature and air pressure, just sitting there behind closed doors like a storm reservoir. As if every silent room around you right now, in your home, campus, or office park, leads an unacknowledged meteorological double-life: rooms and streets full of air poised just this side of thunderous disequilibrium, on the cusp of becoming a hurricane.

[Image: Hurricane Katrina approaches New Orleans—possibly attracted there, a new study suggests, by the "rough cityscape" of the greater metropolitan region].

I'm reminded of the storm-storage islands described in Greek mythology—for instance, one of my favorite architectural designs of all time, from Virgil's Aeneid, a place called "Aeolia, the weather-breeding isle," where all the winds of the world are stored:
    Here in a vast cavern King Aeolus
    Rules the contending winds and moaning gales
    As warden of their prison. Round the walls
    They chafe and bluster underground. The din
    Makes a great mountain murmur overhead.
    High on a citadel enthroned,
    Scepter in hand, he molifies their fury,
    Else they might flay the sea and sweep away
    Land masses and deep sky through empty air.
    In fear of this, Jupiter hid them away
    In caverns of black night. He set above them
    Granite of high mountains—and a king
    Empowered at command to rein them in
    Or let them go. (Book 1, 75-89)
Only here, in the 21st-century city, some rogue weather god keeps unparalleled atmospheric disturbances hidden away inside a carefully guarded urban archive of future storms, just waiting for release: proto-hurricanes saved inside sports stadiums, opera houses, suburban homes, and office towers, compressed down into sewers and alleys and discount shoe warehouse storefronts, all bodies of air prepared to become gales if the right links and cross-connections can be made. Vast ductwork cuts in and out of the city, carefully sealed off inside with valves—valves that should only be opened if you want to seed new storm systems, like a multi-county air conditioner gone absurdly out of control.

Or it's the breezy future of street-cleaning. An alternative to fireworks on the 4th of July. A side-effect of urban planning just waiting to be weaponized. An opportunity for urban scale climatological re-engineering brought to you by Trane.

[Image: Hurricane Isabel seen from space].

We saw long ago, for instance, that "many of the skyscrapers in Shanghai could become quite dangerous" due to the high winds they've started to generate. Indeed, "concerns have been raised about the strong and thus damaging winds that are result[ing] from the dense population of skyscrapers so central to the metropolis."

The city, in other words, is generating its own weather. Add this new study—with cities like New Orleans and Miami and New York literally attracting hurricanes to themselves—and the burgeoning field of urban architectural meteorology just got a lot more urgent (and interesting).

(Thanks to Tim Maly for the link!)

Glenn Beck: An Ego in Search of a Message

Glenn Beck has annoyed me for the eight years I've known of him. I couldn't fully articulate why until this weekend. I always thought his over-the-top antics would fizzle out on radio as more people yearned for serious analysis and less sarcasm. When he went to CNN, I figured he would be the next in the long line of radio personalities who wouldn't translate to television. But Fox intervened and his celebrity has taken off. Now he's writing novels and becoming a religious crusader. Don't think Mr. Beck hasn't noticed that his level of influence is at an all-time high.


Just as it is obvious that Mr. Beck is in over his head, it is just as obvious he has no clear understanding of his limitations. While I am glad he is informing large swaths of the public about subjects I have come to know and despise (liberation theology, for example), he is quickly turning into a clownish figure who would probably endorse a third party if he could figure out how to benefit. Couching behind his newly-found religious voice which gives him the pretense of humility, Mr. Beck appears to be every bit the narcissist our president is. Not only does he presume to be a political expert, he is now some sort of preacher of an ambiguous gospel. And why has he adopted this new religious tone?


Even the most crass among us would have to admit that the world of politics has final limitations. There is only so much influence one can exert as a politician. Even presidents rarely get all of their agenda passed. People of genuine faith are not cowered by politicians, which is why most dictators want to kill off as many priests as possible. Religion, specifically Christianity, and its transcendent truths stubbornly resist the promises and threats of politicians. So if you want to rise above politics, there is only one place to go. I think that explains Mr. Beck's sudden and extremely shallow religious diatribes: his ratings and influence have peaked, and his ego needs a larger outlet. But instead of actually learning about theology or humbling himself, he is now simply using the Lord's name in vein to promote his own brand. He is weakly and inarticulately talking about some kind of god to give credence to his self-proclaimed role of Tea Party leader.


But to what God is Mr. Beck referring? As a Mormon, does Mr. Beck share the same God as me, a Christian? Is he speaking about Father, Son, Holy Spirit (Christianity), or some god that was once a man and had sex with many goddesses, including the virgin Mary to beget Jesus (Mormonism)? Unless he is stealthily trying to convert the Tea Party to Mormonism (which would make him more intelligent than I think he is), I am not convinced he knows or cares what god he is invoking from the heavens. He just likes that three-letter word and all the assumptions of holiness and innocence that come with it. Anyone who talks about God can attract an audience for a while, because God is generally of interest to us all.


But if you ask any preacher about the crucible of the pulpit, you will quickly learn that preaching is a dangerous and perilous venture. You are proclaiming the Word of God, no small task. It requires the best of your heart, soul and mind. And above all, it demands humility. If a pastor is not humble, he should be after trying to figure out how to create a relevant, interesting and faithful message on scriptural texts. I sense no humility in Glenn Beck. Just lazy, shoddy theology from a careless Mormon who desperately needs to be seen as necessary to the conservative renaissance in America.


Worse, I wonder if he is trying to write himself into the history books. He rightly observes that these years are a possible turning point in American history and he wants to be remembered as important when the history is written. He knows that if he stays in the political arena, his influence will be moderate. But if he can combine politics and religion, perhaps he has a powerful combination. But he won't go down as a great leader. His lack of substance will catch up to him. He borrows from the best American minds and now from God Almighty to prop himself up. But, Lord willing, he won't be standing much longer.

August 31, 2010

31 in 31: #31

This is a series for August 2010 which documents my on-the-ground -- and on-the-webs -- research for my guidebook to contemporary NYC architecture (to be released next year by W. W. Norton). Archives can be found at the bottom of the post and via the 31 in 31 label.

Sperone Westwater Gallery

The Sperone Westwater Gallery, designed Foster + Partners, is nearing completion about a block north of the New Museum. This piece continues the transformation of the Bowery, from Cooper Union down to Chinatown. In the ten or eleven years since I stayed at a hostel on the Bowery the street has seen numerous new buildings as well as restaurants and shops, displacing the old flophouses and mainstays like CBGB's.


Sperone Westwater Gallery

I always liked to think of the Bowery as un-gentrifiable, a zone immune to the changes in neighborhing SoHo, NoHo, the Lower East Side, and the East Village. Of course I was wrong, but a nine-story building with a bright red elevator on its facade is probably the last thing I would have expected from the alternative scenario.

Sperone Westwater Gallery

Norman Foster's design is the antithesis of the New Museum, which made the Bowery cool for institutions with money to spend on buildings by name-brand architects. SANAA's stacked and shifted white boxes respond to the zoning envelope without making that legal device explicit; Foster's design rises to the maximum street wall and then sets back once. Done.

Sperone Westwater Gallery

Granted, the 20-foot-wide lot doesn't give much room for play, so Foster focuses on the skins. Facing the Bowery on the first five floors is an all-glass wall with laminations that allow light and views, but the latter are indistinct, yet not so much that the elevator's workings aren't apparent. One effect of the glass, which lies somewhere between transparent and translucent, is the band of light visible in these photos. It must be an unwritten code that new buildings must have a surface that blinds passersby!



Sperone Westwater Gallery

The side walls, facing north and south, are blanketed with black corrugated metal, the panels mimicking -- but oddly not following exactly, in size or spacing -- the glass on the front. The rear facade is similar to the top of the front, with a zipper of clear glass running vertically between what looked to be solid panels (not translucent like the front). Foster's design certainly has a strong presence on the Bowery, but its industrial elegance will pack more of a wallop at night when the glass box is illuminated and the red box glows.

Previously:
#1 - Phyto Universe
#2 - One Bryant Park
#3 - Pier 62 Carousel
#4 - Bronx River Art Center
#5 - The Pencil Factory
#6 - Westbeth Artists' Housing
#7 - 23 Beekman Place
#8 - Metal Shutter Houses
#9 - Bronx Box
#10 - American Academy of Arts and Letters
#11 - FDR Four Freedoms Park
#12 - One Madison Park
#13 - Pio Pio Restaurant
#14 - Queens West (Stage II)
#15 - 785 Eighth Avenue
#16 - Big Bambú
#17 - Event Horizon
#18 - Murano
#19 - William Lescaze House
#20 - Morgan Library and Museum
#21 - MTA Flood Mitigation
#22 - Wilf Hall
#23 - Yohji Yamamoto
#24 - NYU Center for Academic and Spiritual Life
#25 - Nehemiah Spring Creek
#26 - Longchamps
#27 - 9th Street Residence
#28 - Crocs
#29 - Art et Industrie
#30 - Tartinery Nolita

31 in 31: #30

This is a series for August 2010 which documents my on-the-ground -- and on-the-webs -- research for my guidebook to contemporary NYC architecture (to be released next year by W. W. Norton). Archives can be found at the bottom of the post and via the 31 in 31 label.

Tartinery Nolita

Spotted at The Architect's Newspaper, Tartinery Nolita is a new restaurant located on Mulberry next to Spring Lounge. Designed by SOMA Architects, the facade is marked by deep-set, black-steel fins projecting from the storefront glazing.

Tartinery Nolita

These fins -- spaced randomly across the elevation --work to hide and reveal the spaces behind. The shallow bar occupies the northern end (right in photos), and the double-height dining area sits to the south.

Tartinery Nolita

The bar-code design is more interesting from across the street than from the adjacent sidewalk (the top image of the archpaper piece testifies to this).

Tartinery Nolita

But from directly in front of the restaurant, the double-height dining area attracts the most attention. From the sidewalk the space extends to the cellar; an exposed brick wall behind mesh stands out at the southern end of the restaurant. A small tree also occupies this lower space, rising from the middle of a table.

Tartinery Nolita

Previously:
#1 - Phyto Universe
#2 - One Bryant Park
#3 - Pier 62 Carousel
#4 - Bronx River Art Center
#5 - The Pencil Factory
#6 - Westbeth Artists' Housing
#7 - 23 Beekman Place
#8 - Metal Shutter Houses
#9 - Bronx Box
#10 - American Academy of Arts and Letters
#11 - FDR Four Freedoms Park
#12 - One Madison Park
#13 - Pio Pio Restaurant
#14 - Queens West (Stage II)
#15 - 785 Eighth Avenue
#16 - Big Bambú
#17 - Event Horizon
#18 - Murano
#19 - William Lescaze House
#20 - Morgan Library and Museum
#21 - MTA Flood Mitigation
#22 - Wilf Hall
#23 - Yohji Yamamoto
#24 - NYU Center for Academic and Spiritual Life
#25 - Nehemiah Spring Creek
#26 - Longchamps
#27 - 9th Street Residence
#28 - Crocs
#29 - Art et Industrie

Monday, Monday

My weekly page update:

This week's dose features 40R_Laneway House in Toronto, Ontario, Canada by superkül inc | architect:
this       week's  dose

The featured past dose is Courtyard House in Toronto, Ontario, Canada by Studio Junction:
featured      past   dose

This week's book review is Encyclopedia of Detail in Contemporary Residential Architecture by Virginia McLeod:
this week's book    review


**NOTE: The next "weekly dose" will be 2010.09.13.**

Some unrelated links for your enjoyment:
The Bankruptcy of Architecture
See the results of "an intensive 10-day studio 18-27 August, Chania, Crete, Venetian Arsenal."

round houses
Not square, round. (added to sidebar under blogs::architecture)

Things Organized Neatly
Just like the title says.

World Landscape Architect
"A weblog to provide built environment news and information for landscape architects and built environment professionals." (added to sidebar under blogs::landscape)

August 30, 2010

31 in 31: #28

This is a series for August 2010 which documents my on-the-ground -- and on-the-webs -- research for my guidebook to contemporary NYC architecture (to be released next year by W. W. Norton). Archives can be found at the bottom of the post and via the 31 in 31 label.


View Larger Map

For now the above street view shows what architect William J. Rockwell faced in turning a Tennessee Mountain restaurant into a Crocs flagship store, located at Spring and Wooster Streets in SoHo. Alterations to the early 19th-century, many-times-renovated corner house required Landmarks (LPC) approval. When compared with the photo below, taken earlier today, the changes were fairly minimal, occurring on the ground floor.

Crocs

The three-story garage behind the house was demolished, but then LPC turned down Mitchell's first design which resembled the old garage. Instead they recommended "a modern transitional glass piece," according to The Architect's Newspaper. The new piece has some of the clearest clear glass I've seen lately, making the colorful Crocs shoes/sandals pop, but also the ducts, sprinkler pipes, and other fittings.

Crocs

This project is a small but nevertheless notable example of LPC's assertion that new buildings should look new, so they are not confused with their historical neighbors. It is a view contested by Steven W. Semes in The Future of the Past; he argues that buildings should find continuity with their historical neighbors in an effort to extend some bits of culture from the past to the present and into the future. He would have fought for Mitchell's initial design, but I find the new glass box pleasing, if conventional. It is certainly a foil to the corner house, but it still could have found some inspiration in this historic building; as is it's like a Crate & Barrel squeezed into the small rear lot, well done but looking like it could exist somewhere else as easily as on this lot in SoHo.

Crocs

Previously:
#1 - Phyto Universe
#2 - One Bryant Park
#3 - Pier 62 Carousel
#4 - Bronx River Art Center
#5 - The Pencil Factory
#6 - Westbeth Artists' Housing
#7 - 23 Beekman Place
#8 - Metal Shutter Houses
#9 - Bronx Box
#10 - American Academy of Arts and Letters
#11 - FDR Four Freedoms Park
#12 - One Madison Park
#13 - Pio Pio Restaurant
#14 - Queens West (Stage II)
#15 - 785 Eighth Avenue
#16 - Big Bambú
#17 - Event Horizon
#18 - Murano
#19 - William Lescaze House
#20 - Morgan Library and Museum
#21 - MTA Flood Mitigation
#22 - Wilf Hall
#23 - Yohji Yamamoto
#24 - NYU Center for Academic and Spiritual Life
#25 - Nehemiah Spring Creek
#26 - Longchamps
#27 - 9th Street Residence

Relocative Media

Just a quick note to say that I haven't fallen off a bridge, I've simply moved back to Los Angeles after a cross-country drive (the second this summer), we've hauled everything out of a storage unit where it'd been gathering dust for 15 months, and, on top of the ins and outs of any major relocation, we've only just got home internet worked out—so I'm unbelievably behind in posting. But hello once again from Los Angeles—and expect to see more here shortly!

Humor note

BeyondDC actually believe this? 

Ten years ago, when the urbanist movement was in its infancy and supporters were few and far between, we liked to say that better cities and better transit...(italics added)
Update: I may have been too cryptic. I am not referring to conservatives getting interested in public transportation. Not at all and I welcome it  though I am a bit dubious about what they will be able to do with their (usual) anti-government stance. 

What I am referring to was the idea that concern about the urban environment was in its infancy ten years ago. That's preposterous and risible and just plain wrong. But I imagine that someone on the younger side and who just woke up about such things ten years ago might think that no one had ever thought about cities before. Quite normal and human. Just funny if one has been trying to get something done for the past 40 years, and what I learned was from older people.

31 in 31: #29

This is a series for August 2010 which documents my on-the-ground -- and on-the-webs -- research for my guidebook to contemporary NYC architecture (to be released next year by W. W. Norton). Archives can be found at the bottom of the post and via the 31 in 31 label.

Art et Industrie

Although completed a couple years before 2000, the former Art et Industrie sculpture garden is something I was intrigued about, so I searched it out over the weekend and took a close look at it. Designed by Architecture Research Office (ARO) and located at the corner of Thompson and Broome Streets, the meat of the project is basically two solid-steel fences that follow the corner.

Art et Industrie

I'm not sure what Art et Industrie displayed in its indoor and outdoor galleries, but the fence is like a piece of Modernist sculpture: well-crafted, simple, and easy to miss.

Art et Industrie

Painted a dark gray, thin sheets of steel (I'm guessing about 8' by 8') are welded to matching steel H-shape supports which double as deep reveals.

Art et Industrie

The posts stop a little bit short of the panels, allowing the thinness of the latter to be legible. Visible below, the corner overlap puts the simple construction of the two elements on display.

Art et Industrie

The adjacent storefront space is empty, and a peek through the space reveals a pleasing garden. But in an area surrounded by mid- and high-rise construction, what is the future of this outdoor space? If I'm reading it right, a recent DOB filing points to an "eating and drinking establishment," something easy to imagine working well here, indoors and out.

Art et Industrie

Previously:
#1 - Phyto Universe
#2 - One Bryant Park
#3 - Pier 62 Carousel
#4 - Bronx River Art Center
#5 - The Pencil Factory
#6 - Westbeth Artists' Housing
#7 - 23 Beekman Place
#8 - Metal Shutter Houses
#9 - Bronx Box
#10 - American Academy of Arts and Letters
#11 - FDR Four Freedoms Park
#12 - One Madison Park
#13 - Pio Pio Restaurant
#14 - Queens West (Stage II)
#15 - 785 Eighth Avenue
#16 - Big Bambú
#17 - Event Horizon
#18 - Murano
#19 - William Lescaze House
#20 - Morgan Library and Museum
#21 - MTA Flood Mitigation
#22 - Wilf Hall
#23 - Yohji Yamamoto
#24 - NYU Center for Academic and Spiritual Life
#25 - Nehemiah Spring Creek
#26 - Longchamps
#27 - 9th Street Residence
#28 - Crocs

August 28, 2010

Today's archidose #436

.flickr-photo { border: solid 2px #000000; }.flickr-yourcomment { }.flickr-frame { text-align: left; padding: 3px; }.flickr-caption { font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px; }

Würzburg Weingut Stein a, originally uploaded by david pasek.
Weingut Am Stein (presentation and seminar rooms for winery) in Wuerzburg, Germany by Hofmann Keicher Ring Architekten, 2005

To contribute your Flickr images for consideration, just:
:: Join and add photos to the archidose pool, and/or
::Tag your photos archidose

Hives and valves, filters and membranes

[Image: Detailed view of Hylozoic Ground's "Protocell" assembly; courtesy of Philip Beesley Architect].

Philip Beesley's Hylozoic Ground installation opens this coming Friday at the Venice Biennale, where it is installed inside the Canadian pavilion. It is a "suspended geotextile that gradually accumulates hybrid soil from ingredients drawn from its surroundings."

As Beesley explains, "Hylozoic Ground is an immersive, interactive environment that moves and breathes around its viewers... Next-generation artificial intelligence, synthetic biology, and interactive technology create an environment that is nearly alive." Indeed, he adds, "hylozoism is the ancient belief that all matter has life."

[Image: Detail from Hylozoic Ground; courtesy of Philip Beesley Architect].

Part of this artificial life comes from the "intricate lattice of small transparent acrylic meshwork links" that make up the project, as well as the "network of interactive mechanical fronds, filters and whiskers" that form its periphery. Together, these allow the installation's edges to "arch uncannily towards those who venture into its midst, reaching out to stroke and be stroked like the feather or fur or hair of some mysterious animal."

[Image: Detail from Hylozoic Ground; courtesy of Philip Beesley Architect].

The resulting structure is "similar to a coral reef, following cycles of opening, clamping, filtering and digesting. Arrays of touch sensors create waves of diffuse breathing motion, luring visitors into the shimmering depths of a forest of light."
    Akin to the functions of a living system, embedded machine intelligence allows human interaction to trigger breathing, caressing, and swallowing motions and hybrid metabolic exchanges. These empathic motions ripple out from hives of kinetic valves and pores in peristaltic waves, creating a diffuse pumping that pulls air, moisture and stray organic matter through the filtering Hylozoic membranes. "Living" chemical exchanges are conceived as the first stages of self-renewing functions that might take root within this architecture.
The sculpture's "chemical exchanges" were engineered in collaboration with architect Rachel Armstrong (whose TED talk on lifting the city of Venice out of its encroaching lagoon by growing an artificial reef beneath the city is worth checking out).

[Image: Detail from Hylozoic Ground; courtesy of Philip Beesley Architect].

There is also an accompanying book coming out in time for the Biennale, and I'm excited to say that I've got a short essay in it; it also includes texts by Rachel Armstrong, Detlef Mertins, Neil Spiller, and many more, and it explores the various architectural, scientific, and technical implications of Beesley's work.

Briefly, as I suggest in my own essay, Beesley's work deserves a much wider audience than architectural Biennales. Living geotextiles that double as soil-producing landscapes—that is, they create their own biomass—these would not even be out of place in conversations about experimental agriculture and even large-scale terraforming.

If Mars, for instance, as we read earlier this week, is actually "ideally suited for crop farming," then I can easily see how a massive, self-unfolding custom geotextile, designed by Philip Beesley, could origami itself out from a NASA landing pod and begin the generations-long process of making another planet habitable for terrestrial life (there are, of course, very clear moral and biochemical objections to the idea of spreading Earthly life beyond our planet, but I am willfully overlooking those right now).

[Image: NASA/KSC Mars Greenhouse Project].

If the above image, released by the Mars Greenhouse Project to illustrate the possibilities of offworld agriculture, instead depicted Beesley's Hylozoic Soil sprouting hives, valves, filters, and membranes to form a future living system, then perhaps the hidden value of these sorts of architectural experiments might be revealed.

In any case, if you're in Venice this week, stop by the opening of Hylozoic Ground at the Biennale.

August 27, 2010

31 in 31: #27

This is a series for August 2010 which documents my on-the-ground -- and on-the-webs -- research for my guidebook to contemporary NYC architecture (to be released next year by W. W. Norton). Archives can be found at the bottom of the post and via the 31 in 31 label.

9th Street Residence

Across the street from the strange Germanic streetscape of NYU's Deutsches Haus is a full block of beige brick, setbacks, and balconies. Some of the last are filled in (bottom middle of photo above) to convert the outdoor "rooms" to indoor space. Most of these new enclosures are unexceptional, but a piece capping one of the setbacks is subtly different, channel glass walls rising behind the old guardrails. Designed by Rogers Marvel Architects, the 9th Street Residence combined two apartments into one; the glass enclosure is an extension that houses the living area. The channel glass wraps over the space, visible in the photo below through the horizontal vision glass that wraps the corner.

9th Street Residence

Previously:
#1 - Phyto Universe
#2 - One Bryant Park
#3 - Pier 62 Carousel
#4 - Bronx River Art Center
#5 - The Pencil Factory
#6 - Westbeth Artists' Housing
#7 - 23 Beekman Place
#8 - Metal Shutter Houses
#9 - Bronx Box
#10 - American Academy of Arts and Letters
#11 - FDR Four Freedoms Park
#12 - One Madison Park
#13 - Pio Pio Restaurant
#14 - Queens West (Stage II)
#15 - 785 Eighth Avenue
#16 - Big Bambú
#17 - Event Horizon
#18 - Murano
#19 - William Lescaze House
#20 - Morgan Library and Museum
#21 - MTA Flood Mitigation
#22 - Wilf Hall
#23 - Yohji Yamamoto
#24 - NYU Center for Academic and Spiritual Life
#25 - Nehemiah Spring Creek
#26 - Longchamps

31 in 31: #26

This is a series for August 2010 which documents my on-the-ground -- and on-the-webs -- research for my guidebook to contemporary NYC architecture (to be released next year by W. W. Norton). Archives can be found at the bottom of the post and via the 31 in 31 label.

Longchamps

Double glass doors cut into an otherwise blank brick wall barely hint at the stunning space for Longchamps on Spring Street in SoHo. Designed by Heatherwick Studio and completed in 2006, a "landscape stair" is the defining element that ties the ground floor with larger second floor above. Longchamps makes handbags, among other things, so appropriately the continuous treads appear to be made of leather (they are rubber on steel plate). Black posts and handrails are the only other major visual element occupying the space (beside the goods); the glass guardrails--fabricated the same way as car windshields--disappear at certain angles and create blurry reflections at other angles. All is skylit, like a luxury stairway to heaven. It is one of the best retail environments in Manhattan, because it finds inspiration in the product and fuses its expression with its function as an armature for displaying merchandise.

Previously:
#1 - Phyto Universe
#2 - One Bryant Park
#3 - Pier 62 Carousel
#4 - Bronx River Art Center
#5 - The Pencil Factory
#6 - Westbeth Artists' Housing
#7 - 23 Beekman Place
#8 - Metal Shutter Houses
#9 - Bronx Box
#10 - American Academy of Arts and Letters
#11 - FDR Four Freedoms Park
#12 - One Madison Park
#13 - Pio Pio Restaurant
#14 - Queens West (Stage II)
#15 - 785 Eighth Avenue
#16 - Big Bambú
#17 - Event Horizon
#18 - Murano
#19 - William Lescaze House
#20 - Morgan Library and Museum
#21 - MTA Flood Mitigation
#22 - Wilf Hall
#23 - Yohji Yamamoto
#24 - NYU Center for Academic and Spiritual Life
#25 - Nehemiah Spring Creek

31 in 31: #20

This is a series for August 2010 which documents my on-the-ground -- and on-the-webs -- research for my guidebook to contemporary NYC architecture (to be released next year by W. W. Norton). Archives can be found at the bottom of the post and via the 31 in 31 label.

morgan.gif

Many people are familiar with Renzo Piano's design of the Morgan Library & Museum, notable--and controversial--for its contrast to the early 20th-century and the skylit atrium that internally connects the various structures. Piano's expansion fronts Madison Avenue, where the main entry is located. Pierpont Morgan's study and library faces 36th Street, where the new building is set back from it and the gallery building. So what is on 37th Street, next to the Morgan House (now bookstore for the Library & Museum)? A service walkway, loading, and a dumpster, of course.

New Museum

Sure, just like the human body, every building needs to deal with how things go in and out, but spending a few minutes glancing (and taking photos, above) at this area, I felt like this side wasn't really considered as much as it should have been. In Manhattan, loading often occurs through the sidewalk (those hatches all over the place), but for larger buildings a garage or other internal space is often necessary. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't be well done. I think SANAA did the opposite of Piano and actually embraced this "other side" of the building, visually opening up the loading to the street (left side on link and above). That embrace arises from the fact loading occurs a few feet away from the main entry, not around the corner. Yet it's still refreshing to see an architect confront the situation that is normally out of sight and out of mind.

Previously:
#1 - Phyto Universe
#2 - One Bryant Park
#3 - Pier 62 Carousel
#4 - Bronx River Art Center
#5 - The Pencil Factory
#6 - Westbeth Artists' Housing
#7 - 23 Beekman Place
#8 - Metal Shutter Houses
#9 - Bronx Box
#10 - American Academy of Arts and Letters
#11 - FDR Four Freedoms Park
#12 - One Madison Park
#13 - Pio Pio Restaurant
#14 - Queens West (Stage II)
#15 - 785 Eighth Avenue
#16 - Big Bambú
#17 - Event Horizon
#18 - Murano
#19 - William Lescaze House